Does Retatrutide Cause Muscle Loss?

Investigational · not FDA approved

Editorially reviewed · Last updated September 9, 2026 · How we review

Key findings

  • Retatrutide treatment was accompanied by fat and lean-mass loss in a small Phase 2 DXA substudy in adults with type 2 diabetes.
  • DXA lean mass is not identical to skeletal muscle and does not directly measure strength or muscle quality.
  • The study does not establish a muscle-protecting effect from retatrutide’s glucagon activity or a universal percentage of lean mass lost.
  • General GLP-1 nutrition guidance supports individualized protein intake and resistance training; these strategies have not been proven to prevent all lean loss during retatrutide treatment.
Retatrutide treatment was accompanied by lean-mass loss in a Phase 2 study. But lean mass is not the same as muscle, and the study does not show that everyone loses the same proportion or that retatrutide is worse than other drugs.

DXA measures fat, lean soft tissue and bone mineral. Lean tissue includes muscle, organs and body water; a scan alone does not measure strength or diagnose sarcopenia. The useful questions are how body composition changes, whether strength and function are maintained, and whether nutrition and activity remain adequate.

Retatrutide's first published body composition data — a Phase 2 sub-study using DXA scans — was reported in The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology in June 2025. This page covers what that data shows, what it means, and what we still do not know.
Retatrutide is an investigational drug that has not been approved by the FDA.

Weight, lean tissue and strength answer different questions

Fat mass

DXA estimates body fat. Change in fat mass was the substudy’s primary endpoint.

Lean soft tissue

Includes muscle, organs and water. A decrease is not a direct measure of skeletal muscle loss.

Strength and function

Need their own assessments. A scan cannot tell you how well someone can lift, walk or rise from a chair.

These are measurement categories, not proportions of weight lost. Read the retatrutide DXA substudy and the nutrition and activity discussion.

Before digging into the data, you can jump to nutrition and activity, protein planning or small-portion recipes. Those resources help with planning; they do not establish that any routine prevents retatrutide-associated lean-mass loss.

The Phase 2 Body Composition Sub-Study

Published in The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology (June 2025), this sub-study provides the first DXA body composition data for retatrutide in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Study design

  • Sub-study within the Phase 2 T2D trial (NCT04867785)
  • Body composition measured by DXA scans (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry) — the clinical gold standard for distinguishing fat mass from lean mass
  • 36 weeks of treatment
  • Primary endpoint: percent change in total fat mass at 36 weeks vs. placebo and dulaglutide (an existing GLP-1 drug)
  • Comparators: placebo and dulaglutide 1.5mg

Who was actually scanned

Of the 281 participants in the main Phase 2 trial, 189 enrolled in the body composition sub-study; 155 had a baseline DXA scan and 103 completed treatment plus both baseline and week-36 scans. Per-arm enrollment:
ArmEnrolled in Sub-Study
Placebo29
Dulaglutide 1.5 mg34
Retatrutide 0.5 mg32
Retatrutide 4 mg (pooled)31
Retatrutide 8 mg (pooled)33
Retatrutide 12 mg30

56% of sub-study participants were female; 85% were White, 13% Black, and 3% Asian.

Why this data matters

This is the first time retatrutide's effect on body composition has been measured with DXA, providing objective data on how much of the weight lost is fat versus lean tissue. Prior to this, all retatrutide weight loss data reported only total body weight — we could not determine the composition of that weight loss.

What the sub-study reported

Coskun and colleagues published the results in The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology (2025). The analysis used available on-treatment DXA data before drug discontinuation. At 36 weeks, fat mass changed as follows:
GroupFat mass change at 36 weeksSignificance vs. placebo
Placebo-4.5%—
Dulaglutide 1.5 mg-2.6%—
Retatrutide 0.5 mg-4.9%Not significant
Retatrutide 4 mg-15.2%-10.7 pp, p=0.0013
Retatrutide 8 mg-26.1%-21.6 pp, p<0.0001
Retatrutide 12 mg-23.2%-18.7 pp, p<0.0001
Lean mass also decreased. The authors interpreted the proportion of lean-mass loss as similar to other obesity treatments; the study did not directly compare retatrutide with semaglutide or tirzepatide.

A percentage reduction in starting fat mass is not the percentage of total weight loss that was fat. For example, the table’s 26.1% is a change in the 8 mg group’s fat mass, not a claim that 26.1% of its weight loss was fat or muscle. Nor does the finding establish that retatrutide preserves all muscle or causes muscle growth.

Safety within the sub-study: adverse events were similar between groups, with gastrointestinal events the most frequently reported. Serious adverse events occurred in 7% of the placebo arm, 6% at retatrutide 0.5 mg, 0% at 4 mg, 9% at 8 mg, and 3% at 12 mg — and no deaths were reported.

Caveats: only 103 of the 189 enrolled participants completed treatment and both DXA scans. Total fat-mass change was the substudy’s prespecified primary endpoint, but the small sample and missing scans limit interpretation. The lower point estimate at 12 mg than 8 mg does not establish a dose plateau or its cause. Results in adults with type 2 diabetes may not generalize to everyone with obesity.


The Muscle Loss Question in Context

Why muscle loss matters during weight loss

When the body is in caloric deficit — whether from a drug that reduces appetite or from eating less — it draws energy from both fat stores and lean tissue. The consequences of excessive lean mass loss include:

  • Reduced resting metabolic rate — muscle is metabolically active tissue, so losing it lowers the number of calories your body burns at rest
  • Impaired physical function — particularly concerning in older adults, where sarcopenia (age-related muscle loss) is already a risk
  • Potential for weight regain — a lower metabolic rate after weight loss can create conditions favorable for regaining weight if the drug is stopped
  • Bone density reduction — significant weight loss can also reduce bone mineral density, increasing fracture risk

What we know from other GLP-1 drugs

Other weight-management studies also report lean-mass loss alongside fat loss. Comparing percentages across studies requires care: age, diabetes status, baseline composition, duration and measurement methods differ.

The 2025 joint nutrition advisory distinguishes lean mass from muscle mass. Its sex-specific modeled muscle-loss estimates are not measured retatrutide lean-mass results. No universal “acceptable loss below 25%” threshold was established by the cited sources; function and the person’s starting health matter as well as a ratio.

Why Retatrutide Might Differ

The glucagon hypothesis

Retatrutide’s glucagon activity is a reason to study body composition, not a guarantee of muscle preservation. The DXA paper notes both preclinical fat-loss findings and a potential concern: chronic glucagon activity can lower circulating amino acids, which could affect muscle protein synthesis.

Important caveats

The clinical substudy found a proportion of lean-mass loss broadly consistent with other weight treatments. It did not show that glucagon caused a better ratio. Glucagon agonism is also not unique to retatrutide: mazdutide and survodutide target that receptor too. Direct comparisons and measurements of strength and function are needed before claiming a muscle-preserving advantage.


Preserving Muscle During Weight Loss

Resistance training and adequate nutrition can help preserve muscle during weight loss, but they do not guarantee a particular result. Health conditions, age, weight-loss rate and starting function also matter. In 2025 the American College of Lifestyle Medicine, the American Society for Nutrition, the Obesity Medicine Association, and the Obesity Society issued a joint advisory on nutrition during GLP-1 therapy (Mozaffarian et al., Obesity Pillars). Its muscle-preservation targets are summarized below.

Planning Nutrition and Exercise

LeverTargetNotes
Protein — active weight lossProposed range: 1.2–1.6 g/kg/dayActual, adjusted or lean weight may be used; the advisory says there is no consensus, and actual weight can overestimate needs
Protein — alternative basis1.5 g/kg lean body mass/dayThe advisory calls scaling to lean mass more accurate than body-weight scaling
Protein — practical optionExample absolute target: 80–120 g/dayA practical option to individualize with a clinician or dietitian, not a universal minimum
Resistance trainingAt least 3 sessions/weekProgressive overload on the major muscle groups
Aerobic activityAt least 150 min/week (moderate)Supports metabolic health alongside strength work

Exercise and nutrition plans should match physical capacity, medical conditions and dietary needs. The advisory emphasizes individualized assessment, especially when baseline muscle reserve is low.

Why Resistance Training Matters

The advisory recommends combining adequate protein with structured resistance exercise; protein alone is unlikely to preserve muscle without that training stimulus. It suggests strength work at least three times weekly and at least 150 minutes of moderate aerobic activity, adapted to ability. These are general GLP-1-care recommendations, not a tested retatrutide-specific muscle-preservation regimen.

Hitting the protein target is harder on retatrutide

Reduced appetite can make eating enough difficult. The advisory suggests eating protein-rich foods first and considering nutrient-dense options such as eggs, yogurt, fish, legumes or a supplement when needed. Ongoing inability to eat adequately calls for clinical assessment; changing an investigational dose is not a nutrition plan.

For a personal daily gram number from weight (and optional body fat %), use the protein target calculator. For shakes, shot-day soft foods, and the under-eating safety block when appetite is gone, see what to eat on reta.

How much of the loss is muscle?

A scan-based lean-mass estimate cannot answer this precisely because it includes more than skeletal muscle. Strength and physical function deserve attention alongside body composition. The advisory discusses repeat measurements and practical functional assessments; a clinician can choose an approach that fits the person rather than relying only on a scale or percentage.


What We Do Not Know Yet

  • Larger body-composition datasets: the Phase 3 releases reviewed here do not settle the detailed fat, lean tissue and muscle-function questions raised by the small DXA substudy.
  • Long-term muscle function: 36-week body composition does not establish what happens to strength, mobility or lean tissue over years.
  • Direct comparison: the cited substudy does not establish a muscle-preserving advantage over semaglutide or tirzepatide.
  • Bone and frailty outcomes: weight loss and lean-mass measurements alone cannot determine fracture risk or outcomes in older adults with limited muscle reserve.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does retatrutide cause more muscle loss than Ozempic?

The cited DXA study cannot answer that directly. It compared retatrutide with placebo and dulaglutide in adults with type 2 diabetes. Separate semaglutide studies differ in population and design, and lean mass is not identical to muscle.

How can I prevent muscle loss on weight loss drugs?

Structured resistance exercise and adequate nutrition can help, but cannot guarantee no muscle loss. The 2025 joint advisory recommends individualizing protein and exercise targets with a clinician or dietitian. The protein target calculator is a planning aid; what to eat on reta covers practical food options.

Is "Ozempic body" a concern with retatrutide?

“Ozempic body” is not a clinical diagnosis. Appearance cannot distinguish loose skin, fat loss and muscle changes. A transformation photo also cannot establish which drug or activity caused the result. See Can You Build Muscle on Retatrutide? for how to assess those claims.

Does retatrutide reduce visceral fat?

The body-composition study examined abdominal fat as well as total fat and lean mass. Its accessible report supports reduced fat mass, but it does not establish a direct visceral-fat advantage over semaglutide or tirzepatide. Different fat depots and measurement methods should not be treated as interchangeable.

What percentage of retatrutide weight loss is fat versus muscle?

The authors reported that fat loss exceeded lean-mass loss and that the proportion of lean loss was similar to other obesity treatments. There is no single percentage to apply to every person. Lean mass includes tissues other than muscle, and a percentage reduction in starting fat mass is not the fraction of total weight loss that was fat.


For the full adverse-event tables (GI rates, dysesthesia, class warnings), see Retatrutide side effects & safety.

Sources

  • Phase 2 Body Composition Sub-Study. The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology. June 2025. (NCT04867785 sub-study)
  • Coskun, T., Wu, Q., Schloot, N.C., Haupt, A., Milicevic, Z., Khouli, C., Harris, C. (2025). Effects of retatrutide on body composition in people with type 2 diabetes: a substudy of a phase 2, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, randomised trial. The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology. DOI: 10.1016/S2213-8587(25)00092-0
  • Rosenstock, J., et al. (2023). Retatrutide, a GIP, GLP-1 and glucagon receptor agonist, for people with type 2 diabetes. The Lancet. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01053-X
  • Wilding, J.P.H., et al. (2021). Once-Weekly Semaglutide in Adults with Overweight or Obesity (STEP 1). New England Journal of Medicine. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2032183
  • Mozaffarian, D., et al. (2025). Nutritional priorities to support GLP-1 therapy for obesity: a joint advisory from the ACLM, ASN, OMA, and TOS. Obesity Pillars. PMC12264624
  • ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04867785
How we keep this honest
What this is
Educational information, not medical advice. It reports published research — it doesn’t recommend that you use, obtain, or supply anything.
Regulatory status
Retatrutide and similar peptides are investigational — not approved by the FDA or any regulator. Semaglutide and tirzepatide are prescription-only medicines, available only through a licensed prescriber.
Our standard
Every claim traces to a primary source. We label the strength of evidence and flag estimates as estimates — never as clinical fact.
No commercial ties
We don’t sell, supply, or link to suppliers of any medicine, and aren’t affiliated with any manufacturer.

Do not make decisions about your health without consulting a qualified healthcare provider. For trial enrolment, see ClinicalTrials.gov. More on how we review.

Sources

Grounded in primary sources
NEJMThe LancetJAMAFDAClinicalTrials.gov